|
AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 7313P |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023 If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 7313P and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, MATLAB, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Gears 5, 7zip, WPrime, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313P or AMD EPYC 9454P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9454P | 73% |
EPYC 7313P | 61% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 16% better than EPYC 7313P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9454P | 80% |
EPYC 7313P | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 142.3 | 110.7 | Valorant | 161.7 | 125.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.6 | 70.5 | Apex Legends | 152.0 | 118.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.3 | 94.4 | Overwatch | 131.0 | 101.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.6 | 86.8 | DOOM Eternal | 80.9 | 62.9 | Warzone | 126.2 | 98.2 | Assassin's Creed | 135.9 | 105.7 | Valheim | 134.2 | 104.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9454P | 17% |
EPYC 7313P | 28% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9454P since it has less power consumption: 290W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7313P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 116 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9744 | 4742 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 421 | 215 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 20676 | 10051 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1073 | 531 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 53807 | 26137 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7313P | Single-Core | 2439 | 1195 | Multi-Core | 78937 | 38338 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7313P | Single-Core | 1540 | 1329 | Multi-Core | 53258 | 22297 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7313P | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 48 | 16 | Threads | 96 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 155 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000873 100-000000873WOF | 100-000000339 100-100000339WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313P is 8% better than EPYC 9454P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454P has 32 more core than EPYC 7313P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 33
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313P is better: 2 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 7313P before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7313P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|