|
Mediatek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T700 |
|
Comparisons 27-08-2021 Detailed compare data of Mediatek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T700, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Mediatek Dimensity 810 or Unisoc Tiger T700.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediatek Dimensity 810 | 28% |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | 18% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 78% |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediatek Dimensity 810 | 26% |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | 16% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | Total score | 400983 | 258893 | CPU | 112265 | 72481 | GPU | 152363 | 98385 | MEM | 64163 | 41412 | UX | 72173 | 46594 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | Single-Core | 898 | 569 | Multi-Core | 3054 | 2050 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 17.07 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Mediatek Dimensity 810 is 16% better than Unisoc Tiger T700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 247.35 | # of Cores | 2 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.6 | 28.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.8 | 45.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 54.5 | 40.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.9 | 36.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 36.2 | 43.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 55.4 | 59.6 | Real Racing 3 | 68.6 | 61.2 | Sniper 3D | 104.6 | 78.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 65.3 | 65.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.9 | 59.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 71.8 | 45.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | LTE-7 | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1250 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 810 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T700 is better: 11 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Mediatek Dimensity 810 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Unisoc Tiger T700 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|