 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228, comparison of GPUs Adreno 306 and Adreno 306. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Neocore, Octane V2, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 or Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 410 APQ8016 | 1% |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 | 22% |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 | 27% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 410 APQ8016 | 1% |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 | Total score | 20469 | 23111 | CPU | 5724 | 6481 | GPU | 7787 | 8783 | MEM | 3270 | 3690 | UX | 3684 | 4161 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 | Single-Core | 54 | 61 | Multi-Core | 250 | 282 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR2/3 | LPDDR2/3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 533 | 533 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 is 25% better than Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 306 | Adreno 306 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 21.6 | 21.6 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 24 | 24 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 5.5 | 4.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.4 | 16.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 10.8 | 10.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 8.5 | 9.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.5 | 13.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 20.6 | 21.2 | Real Racing 3 | 16.2 | 13.4 | Sniper 3D | 23.8 | 17.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 15.1 | 19.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 15.7 | 15.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 14 | 11.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon LTE modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 is better: 14 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
| |
|