|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 vs Intel Atom Z3560 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 vs Intel Atom Z3560, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR G6430 and Adreno 308. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Atom Z3560 is quad-core (Moorefield). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, AnTuTu, Octane V2, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 or Atom Z3560 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 427 MSM8920 | 2% |
Atom Z3560 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 | 28% |
Atom Z3560 | 35% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 427 MSM8920 | 1% |
Atom Z3560 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 |
Atom Z3560 | Total score | 35832 | 40523 | CPU | 10037 | 11354 | GPU | 13611 | 15398 | MEM | 5733 | 6474 | UX | 6440 | 7284 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 |
Atom Z3560 | Single-Core | 95 | 107 | Multi-Core | 437 | 495 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 |
Atom Z3560 | Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.8 GHz Moorefield | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 677 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3560 is 22% better than Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 308 | PowerVR G6430 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 533 MHz | GFloPS | 27 | 136.4 | # of Cores | | 4 | # of Shader Units | 24 | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 10.5 | 13.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 28.7 | 33.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 18.7 | 22.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 15.9 | 19.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 24.7 | 28.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 35.4 | 42.3 | Real Racing 3 | 28.1 | 39.9 | Sniper 3D | 29.9 | 29.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 33.7 | 27.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 21.5 | 33.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 26.2 | 25.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X9 LTE modem | Intel XMM 7160 | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 72 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3560 is better: 27 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 and Atom Z3560, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Atom Z3560 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|