Comparisons 27-08-2021
Detailed testing data of Mediatek Dimensity 810 vs Samsung Exynos 1080, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Mediatek Dimensity 810 or Exynos 1080.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 68% |
Exynos 1080 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 72% |
Exynos 1080 | 91% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 66% |
Exynos 1080 | 97% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Exynos 1080 | | Total score | 400983 | 676347 | | CPU | 110206 | 196254 | | GPU | 94592 | 275018 | | MEM | 71802 | 106639 | | UX | 62662 | 98702 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Exynos 1080 | | Single-Core | 898 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 3054 | 3731 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Exynos 1080 | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 17.07 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 1080 is 19% better than Mediatek Dimensity 810 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 486 | 1076 | | # of Cores | 2 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 79.5 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 43.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 67.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 99.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 59.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 76.3 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 57.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 69.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 66.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 64 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1250 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC | Galileo, QZSS, GPS, Glonass, Beidou, SBAS | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 810 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 1080 is better: 33
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 1080
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
|
