|
Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Core i5-11260H |
|
Processor comparisons 27-07-2021 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Core i5-11260H and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like UserBenchmark, WPrime, SuperPi, RealBench, Prime95, PassMark, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, Furmark, Blender, VeraCrypt, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11260H or Intel Xeon W-10855M.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon W-10855M | 54% |
Core i5-11260H | 54% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon W-10855M | 53% |
Core i5-11260H | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Control, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.0 | 95.0 | Valorant | 108.0 | 108.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 60.5 | Apex Legends | 101.5 | 101.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 81.0 | Overwatch | 87.5 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.5 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 54.0 | Warzone | 84.2 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 90.7 | 90.7 | Valheim | 89.6 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon W-10855M | 93% |
Core i5-11260H | 143% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-11260H is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-10855M since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 32W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 213 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1407 | 1504 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 175 | 739 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5437 | 2636 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 466 | 1895 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13137 | 8344 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Single-Core | 2801 | 3904 | Multi-Core | 13372 | 14013 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Single-Core | 1264 | 1380 | Multi-Core | 6885 | 6865 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon W-10855M |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | May 01, 2021 | Type | Laptop, Server | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1787 | Core name | Comet Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 2200 millions | 5200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 32 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-10855M is 7% better than Core i5-11260H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-10855M is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11260H is better: 13 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon W-10855M and Intel Core i5-11260H before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon W-10855M Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i5-11260H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13850HX
| |
|