 |
Intel Core i5-1335U vs Intel Core i5-11260H |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-1335U vs Intel Core i5-11260H tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, 3DMark, Furmark, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, SuperPi, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, PassMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11260H or Intel Core i5-1335U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-1335U | 55% |
Core i5-11260H | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-1335U is 1% better than Core i5-11260H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-1335U | 54% |
Core i5-11260H | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.5 | 95.0 | | Valorant | 109.7 | 108.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.4 | 60.5 | | Apex Legends | 103.1 | 101.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.3 | 81.0 | | Overwatch | 88.8 | 87.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.7 | 74.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.8 | 54.0 | | Warzone | 85.5 | 84.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.1 | 90.7 | | Valheim | 91.0 | 89.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-1335U | 321% |
Core i5-11260H | 143% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1335U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11260H as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 32W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i5-11260H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 243 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1836 | 1504 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 596 | 739 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4181 | 2636 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1405 | 1895 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13805 | 8344 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i5-11260H | | Single-Core | 3304 | 3904 | | Multi-Core | 19329 | 14013 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i5-11260H | | Single-Core | 1446 | 1380 | | Multi-Core | 8344 | 6865 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i5-11260H | | Announcement date | January 16, 2023 | May 01, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1787 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 6 | | Threads | 12 | 12 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 5200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 32 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1335U is 23% better than Core i5-11260H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-1335U has 4 more core than Core i5-11260H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1335U is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11260H is better: 5
The summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-1335U and Intel Core i5-11260H before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1335U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-11260H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
|
|
|
