|
Intel Core i7-9750HF vs Intel Xeon W-10855M |
|
Processor comparisons 15-01-2022 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-9750HF vs Intel Xeon W-10855M and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Furmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, MATLAB. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-10855M or Intel Core i7-9750HF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-9750HF | 53% |
Xeon W-10855M | 54% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon W-10855M is 1% better than Core i7-9750HF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-9750HF | 53% |
Xeon W-10855M | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.2 | 95.0 | Valorant | 107.0 | 108.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.9 | 60.5 | Apex Legends | 100.6 | 101.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.3 | 81.0 | Overwatch | 86.7 | 87.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.8 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 53.5 | 54.0 | Warzone | 83.5 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 89.9 | 90.7 | Valheim | 88.8 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-9750HF | 79% |
Xeon W-10855M | 93% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-10855M is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9750HF since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Xeon W-10855M | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 191 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1182 | 1407 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 441 | 175 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2653 | 5437 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1113 | 466 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6912 | 13137 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Xeon W-10855M | Single-Core | 2596 | 2801 | Multi-Core | 11640 | 13372 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Xeon W-10855M | Single-Core | 1067 | 1264 | Multi-Core | 6055 | 6885 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Xeon W-10855M | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop, Server | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 5600 millions | 2200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-10855M is 7% better than Core i7-9750HF in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9750HF is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-10855M is better: 24 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-9750HF and Intel Xeon W-10855M before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-9750HF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i7-13650HX
Intel Xeon W-10855M Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
| |
|