|
Intel Celeron 7300 vs Intel Core i5-11260H |
|
Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Celeron 7300 vs Intel Core i5-11260H and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Prime95, Blender, SuperPi, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, 7zip, 3DMark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Furmark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt. And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Valorant
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11260H or Intel Celeron 7300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron 7300 | 53% |
Core i5-11260H | 54% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-11260H is 1% better than Celeron 7300. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron 7300 | 52% |
Core i5-11260H | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.3 | 95.0 | Valorant | 106.0 | 108.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 60.5 | Apex Legends | 99.6 | 101.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.5 | 81.0 | Overwatch | 85.8 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.1 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 53.0 | 54.0 | Warzone | 82.7 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 89.0 | 90.7 | Valheim | 88.0 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron 7300 | 344% |
Core i5-11260H | 143% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron 7300 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11260H since it has less power consumption: 9W vs. 32W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron 7300 |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 213 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1256 | 1504 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 411 | 739 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2851 | 2636 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 964 | 1895 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 9399 | 8344 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 7300 |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Single-Core | 2254 | 3904 | Multi-Core | 13159 | 14013 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 7300 |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Single-Core | 929 | 1380 | Multi-Core | 5161 | 6865 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Celeron 7300 |
Intel Core i5-11260H | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | May 01, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1787 | Core name | Alder Lake-U | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 1 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 0.7 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 5 | 6 | Threads | 6 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 8200 millions | 5200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 32 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-11260H is 73% better than Celeron 7300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-11260H has 1 more core than Celeron 7300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 7300 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11260H is better: 25 However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Celeron 7300 and Intel Core i5-11260H before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron 7300 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H
Intel Core i5-11260H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13850HX
| |
|