|
Intel Core i9-13900F vs Intel Core i9-10980XE |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13900F vs Intel Core i9-10980XE and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, SuperPi, Gears 5, 3DMark, WPrime, Handbrake, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, Blender, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10980XE or Intel Core i9-13900F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900F | 67% |
Core i9-10980XE | 60% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900F is 10% better than Core i9-10980XE. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900F | 62% |
Core i9-10980XE | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 109.8 | 108.7 | Valorant | 124.7 | 123.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.9 | 69.2 | Apex Legends | 117.3 | 116.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 93.6 | 92.6 | Overwatch | 101.0 | 100.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 86.1 | 85.2 | DOOM Eternal | 62.4 | 61.8 | Warzone | 97.3 | 96.3 | Assassin's Creed | 104.8 | 103.7 | Valheim | 103.5 | 102.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900F | 100% |
Core i9-10980XE | 28% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10980XE since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 165W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900F |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 516 | 211 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5321 | 3800 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 853 | 480 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11816 | 8848 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2998 | 1191 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33980 | 24309 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900F |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Single-Core | 2740 | 2626 | Multi-Core | 57909 | 34005 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900F |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Single-Core | 1965 | 1417 | Multi-Core | 21341 | 20280 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900F |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 24 | 18 | Threads | 32 | 36 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s DMI3 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 165 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 256 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 94 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 24.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900F is 28% better than Core i9-10980XE in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900F has 6 more core than Core i9-10980XE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900F is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10980XE is better: 5 However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Core i9-10980XE before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-10980XE Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
| |
|