|
Intel Core i9-10900TE vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS |
|
Processor comparisons 12-06-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-10900TE vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as WPrime, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, AIDA64, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Blender, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Furmark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS or Intel Core i9-10900TE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-10900TE | 55% |
Ryzen 5 4600HS | 54% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10900TE is 1% better than Ryzen 5 4600HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-10900TE | 54% |
Ryzen 5 4600HS | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.8 | 94.3 | Valorant | 108.8 | 107.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.9 | 60.0 | Apex Legends | 102.3 | 100.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 80.4 | Overwatch | 88.2 | 86.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.1 | 73.9 | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 53.6 | Warzone | 84.9 | 83.6 | Assassin's Creed | 91.4 | 90.0 | Valheim | 90.3 | 89.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-10900TE | 111% |
Ryzen 5 4600HS | 109% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900TE is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 4600HS as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-10900TE |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 199 | 173 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2115 | 1424 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 464 | 436 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4720 | 3158 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1133 | 1162 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10984 | 8934 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900TE |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | Single-Core | 2525 | 2435 | Multi-Core | 16545 | 14510 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900TE |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | Single-Core | 1168 | 1145 | Multi-Core | 7620 | 6187 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-10900TE |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Embedded System | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FP6 | Core name | Comet Lake | Renoir | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 10 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | 4600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 - Up to 3200MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 68 Gb/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 3MB | L3 cache | 20 MB | 8MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000100
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 4600HS is 40% better than Core i9-10900TE in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900TE has 4 more core than Ryzen 5 4600HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900TE is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS is better: 6 Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-10900TE and AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-10900TE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
| |
|