|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Intel Core i9-10900TE |
|
Processor comparisons 12-01-2022 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Intel Core i9-10900TE and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Prime95, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Furmark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, WPrime, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Gears 5. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900TE or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U | 54% |
Core i9-10900TE | 55% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10900TE is 1% better than Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U | 53% |
Core i9-10900TE | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.3 | 95.8 | Valorant | 107.2 | 108.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.0 | 60.9 | Apex Legends | 100.7 | 102.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.4 | 81.6 | Overwatch | 86.8 | 88.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.0 | 75.1 | DOOM Eternal | 53.6 | 54.4 | Warzone | 83.6 | 84.9 | Assassin's Creed | 90.0 | 91.4 | Valheim | 89.0 | 90.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U | 303% |
Core i9-10900TE | 111% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900TE since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 156 | 199 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1256 | 2115 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 278 | 464 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 521 | 4720 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1156 | 1133 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6453 | 10984 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Single-Core | 2463 | 2525 | Multi-Core | 15879 | 16545 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Single-Core | 1366 | 1168 | Multi-Core | 6195 | 7620 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Announcement date | March 16, 2021 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Embedded System | Socket | FP6 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Cezanne | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 5 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 4 | 10 | Threads | 8 | 20 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4200 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 256KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 8MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000587
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is 33% better than Core i9-10900TE in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900TE has 6 more core than Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900TE is better: 27 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U and Intel Core i9-10900TE before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10900TE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300
| |
|