 |
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i3-12100F |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i3-12100F and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, AIDA64, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, 7zip, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, Prime95.
And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-12100F or Intel Core i3-6100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-6100 | 51% |
Core i3-12100F | 56% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-12100F is 8% better than Core i3-6100. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-6100 | 51% |
Core i3-12100F | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.3 | 94.5 | | Valorant | 102.6 | 107.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 60.1 | | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 100.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 80.5 | | Overwatch | 83.1 | 86.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 74.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 53.7 | | Warzone | 80.1 | 83.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 90.2 | | Valheim | 85.2 | 89.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-6100 | 68% |
Core i3-12100F | 99% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-12100F is more energy efficient than the Core i3-6100 as it consumes less power: 51W vs. 58W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-6100 |
Intel Core i3-12100F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 267 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 392 | 1958 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 368 | 642 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 916 | 4447 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 538 | 1503 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2090 | 14658 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6100 |
Intel Core i3-12100F | | Single-Core | 2256 | 3516 | | Multi-Core | 4180 | 20521 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6100 |
Intel Core i3-12100F | | Single-Core | 1050 | 1729 | | Multi-Core | 2271 | 6333 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
Intel Core i3-12100F | | Announcement date | September 17, 2015 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Skylake | Alder Lake-U | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 1 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 51 W | 58 W | | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 5 MB | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-6100 is 72% better than Core i3-12100F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-12100F has 2 more core than Core i3-6100. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-6100 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-12100F is better: 31
However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-6100 and Intel Core i3-12100F before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-6100 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i3-12100F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
