|
AMD 3020e vs Intel Core i5-2400 |
|
Processor comparisons 03-04-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD 3020e vs Intel Core i5-2400 and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, Furmark, Prime95, Handbrake, RealBench, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, AIDA64, 3DMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-2400 or AMD 3020e.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-2400 is 1% better than 3020e. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.2 | 90.5 | Valorant | 101.4 | 102.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 57.6 | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 96.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.0 | 77.2 | Overwatch | 82.1 | 83.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 71.0 | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 51.4 | Warzone | 79.1 | 80.2 | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 86.4 | Valheim | 84.1 | 85.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
3020e | 333% |
Core i5-2400 | 26% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the 3020e is more energy efficient than the Core i5-2400 as it consumes less power: 6W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD 3020e |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 48 | 104 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 254 | 378 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 121 | 267 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 552 | 941 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 312 | 635 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1501 | 2350 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD 3020e |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Single-Core | 1473 | 1589 | Multi-Core | 2644 | 3799 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD 3020e |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Single-Core | 600 | 756 | Multi-Core | 1186 | 2483 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD 3020e |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Announcement date | January 06, 2020 | October 01, 2010 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | Unknown | LGA1155 | Core name | Dali | Sandy Bridge | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 1.2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 2 | 4 | Bus rate | | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 800 millions | 2480 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3 1066/1333 | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | 21 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | 1MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM3020C7T2OFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-2400 is 61% better than 3020e in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-2400 has 2 more core than 3020e. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD 3020e is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-2400 is better: 32 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD 3020e and Intel Core i5-2400 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD 3020e Processor Comparisons • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
Intel Core i5-2400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Core i3-6100
| |
|