|
Intel Core i3-10300T vs Intel Core i7-3770K |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-10300T vs Intel Core i7-3770K and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PassMark, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Blender, Gears 5, MATLAB, WPrime, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, AIDA64, Prime95, Blender, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-3770K or Intel Core i3-10300T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10300T | 52% |
Core i7-3770K | 51% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-10300T is 1% better than Core i7-3770K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10300T | 52% |
Core i7-3770K | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.7 | 92.1 | Valorant | 104.3 | 104.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.4 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 98.0 | 98.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.2 | 78.5 | Overwatch | 84.4 | 84.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.9 | 72.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.1 | 52.4 | Warzone | 81.3 | 81.7 | Assassin's Creed | 87.6 | 88.0 | Valheim | 86.5 | 86.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10300T | 98% |
Core i7-3770K | 42% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10300T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-3770K since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 77W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10300T |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 176 | 137 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 885 | 672 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 408 | 286 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2001 | 1391 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1064 | 1016 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4134 | 3503 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10300T |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Single-Core | 2380 | 2049 | Multi-Core | 8272 | 6445 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10300T |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Single-Core | 1031 | 979 | Multi-Core | 3667 | 4061 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-10300T |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2012 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | LGA1155 | Core name | Comet Lake | Ivy Bridge | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 77 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR3 1333/1600 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-3770K is 14% better than Core i3-10300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10300T is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3770K is better: 13 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-10300T and Intel Core i7-3770K before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-10300T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F
Intel Core i7-3770K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|