 |
Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i5-8500 |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i5-8500 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Gears 5, MATLAB, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, AIDA64, Blender, 3DMark, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-8500 or Intel Core i3-13100F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13100F | 57% |
Core i5-8500 | 52% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100F is 8% better than Core i5-8500. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13100F | 54% |
Core i5-8500 | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.4 | 93.6 | | Valorant | 108.4 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 100.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 87.8 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 84.5 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 89.4 | | Valheim | 89.9 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13100F | 99% |
Core i5-8500 | 57% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-8500 as it consumes less power: 58W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i5-8500 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 220 | 174 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2369 | 934 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 375 | 403 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5273 | 2287 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1332 | 1052 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 15179 | 5612 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i5-8500 | | Single-Core | 1215 | 2461 | | Multi-Core | 25878 | 9554 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i5-8500 | | Single-Core | 1726 | 1114 | | Multi-Core | 7216 | 5496 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i5-8500 | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 6 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2460 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 58 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 9 MB | | Overclocking | y | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-13100F is 11% better than Core i5-8500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-8500 has 2 more core than Core i3-13100F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8500 is better: 5
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13100F and Intel Core i5-8500 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13100F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-8500 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
|
|
|
