Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i3-10320

Processor comparisons   31-01-2023
   Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i3-10320 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Gears 5, Furmark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, SuperPi, WPrime, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, PassMark, UserBenchmark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Prime95, Blender.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:

Watch Dogs Legion
Death Stranding
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Grand Theft Auto V
Fallout 76
Valheim
Red Dead Redemption 2
DOOM: Eternal
Cyberpunk 2077
Fortnite
Borderlands 3
Last Man Standing
Overwatch
Valorant
Apex Legends
Rainbow Six Siege
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Halo Infinite
Assassin's Creed Valhalla

After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10320 or Intel Core i3-13100F.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Core i3-13100F

57%

Core i3-10320

53%

This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100F is 7% better than Core i3-10320. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Core i3-13100F

54%

Core i3-10320

53%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	95.4	93.6
Valorant	108.4	106.3
Cyberpunk 2077	60.7	59.6
Apex Legends	101.9	100.0
Call of Duty Warzone	81.3	79.8
Overwatch	87.8	86.1
Red Dead Redemption 2	74.8	73.4
DOOM Eternal	54.2	53.2
Warzone	84.5	83.0
Assassin's Creed	91.0	89.3
Valheim	89.9	88.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Core i3-13100F

99%

Core i3-10320

67%

To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100F is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10320 as it consumes less power: 58W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	Intel Core i3-13100F	Intel Core i3-10320
Cinbench 15 Single-core	220	206
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	2369	1080
Cinbench 20 Single-core	375	477
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	5273	2444
Cinbench 23 Single-core	1332	1295
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	15179	5028

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i3-13100F	Intel Core i3-10320
Single-Core	1215	2819
Multi-Core	25878	10062

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i3-13100F	Intel Core i3-10320
Single-Core	1726	1307
Multi-Core	7216	5477

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	Intel Core i3-13100F	Intel Core i3-10320
Announcement date	January 19, 2023	October 01, 2020
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1700	FCLGA1200
Core name	Raptor Lake	Comet Lake
Architecture	x86	x86
Generation	13	10
Turbo Frequency	4.5 MHz	4.6 MHz
Frequency	3.4 MHz	3.8 MHz
Cores	4	4
Threads	8	8
Bus rate	14 GT/s	8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	12400 millions	2600 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	58 W	65 W
Memory type	Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s	DDR4-2666
Max. Memory	128 Gb	128 Gb
Memory Frequency	4800
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
L1 cache	1 MB
L2 cache	4 MB
L3 cache	12 MB	8 MB
Overclocking	y	Yes
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10320 is 10% better than Core i3-13100F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100F is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10320 is better: 6
Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13100F and Intel Core i3-10320 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

Intel Core i3-13100F - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Core i3-13100F specs and review.

• Intel Core i3-10320 specs and review.

Intel Core i3-13100F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D

Intel Core i3-10320 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE