 |
Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i3-10105 |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i3-10105 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Prime95, WPrime, PassMark, 7zip, RealBench, Furmark, MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, 3DMark, SuperPi, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10105 or Intel Core i3-13100F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13100F | 57% |
Core i3-10105 | 52% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100F is 8% better than Core i3-10105. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13100F | 54% |
Core i3-10105 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.4 | 92.0 | | Valorant | 108.4 | 104.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 58.6 | | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 98.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 78.4 | | Overwatch | 87.8 | 84.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 72.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 52.3 | | Warzone | 84.5 | 81.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 87.8 | | Valheim | 89.9 | 86.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13100F | 99% |
Core i3-10105 | 62% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100F is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10105 since it has less power consumption: 58W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i3-10105 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 220 | 193 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2369 | 1011 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 375 | 452 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5273 | 2307 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1332 | 1155 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 15179 | 4486 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i3-10105 | | Single-Core | 1215 | 2643 | | Multi-Core | 25878 | 8978 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i3-10105 | | Single-Core | 1726 | 1210 | | Multi-Core | 7216 | 3941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i3-10105 | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 58 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | y | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10105 is 8% better than Core i3-13100F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100F is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10105 is better: 5
However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13100F and Intel Core i3-10105 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13100F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i3-10105 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
|
|
|
