|
Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i9-9900KS tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, PassMark, Furmark, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, MATLAB, Gears 5, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9900KS or Intel Core i3-13100F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13100F | 57% |
Core i9-9900KS | 55% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100F is 3% better than Core i9-9900KS. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13100F | 54% |
Core i9-9900KS | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.4 | 97.7 | Valorant | 108.4 | 111.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 62.2 | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 104.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 83.3 | Overwatch | 87.8 | 89.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 76.6 | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 55.5 | Warzone | 84.5 | 86.6 | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 93.3 | Valheim | 89.9 | 92.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13100F | 99% |
Core i9-9900KS | 35% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9900KS since it has less power consumption: 58W vs. 127W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 220 | 222 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2369 | 2201 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 375 | 518 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5273 | 5226 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1332 | 1284 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 15179 | 12704 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | Single-Core | 1215 | 3018 | Multi-Core | 25878 | 19522 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | Single-Core | 1726 | 1368 | Multi-Core | 7216 | 9501 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13100F |
Intel Core i9-9900KS | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Threads | 8 | 16 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 8600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 58 W | 127 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | y | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9900KS is 15% better than Core i3-13100F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9900KS has 4 more core than Core i3-13100F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100F is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9900KS is better: 21 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13100F and Intel Core i9-9900KS before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13100F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-9900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
| |
|