|
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Intel Core i3-10320 |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Intel Core i3-10320 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like UserBenchmark, 7zip, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, PassMark, WPrime, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, AIDA64. And how good the processors are in games: - Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10320 or AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | 52% |
Core i3-10320 | 53% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-10320 is 1% better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | 51% |
Core i3-10320 | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.3 | 93.6 | Valorant | 103.7 | 106.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 59.6 | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 100.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 79.8 | Overwatch | 84.0 | 86.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 73.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 53.2 | Warzone | 80.9 | 83.0 | Assassin's Creed | 87.1 | 89.3 | Valheim | 86.1 | 88.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | 42% |
Core i3-10320 | 67% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10320 is more energy efficient than the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i3-10320 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 206 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 736 | 1080 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 351 | 477 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1603 | 2444 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 906 | 1295 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4356 | 5028 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i3-10320 | Single-Core | 2344 | 2819 | Multi-Core | 7678 | 10062 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i3-10320 | Single-Core | 823 | 1307 | Multi-Core | 3218 | 5477 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i3-10320 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Dali | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2400 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YD315BC5M4MFH
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10320 is 7% better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10320 is better: 32 However, it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Intel Core i3-10320 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500
Intel Core i3-10320 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|