|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
|
Processor comparisons 22-11-2022 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs Intel Core i3-1110G4 and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, Blender, Prime95, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Gears 5, PassMark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, 7zip, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1110G4 or AMD Ryzen 3 3250U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 3 3250U | 51% |
Core i3-1110G4 | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 3 3250U | 51% |
Core i3-1110G4 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 90.9 | Valorant | 102.1 | 103.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.8 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 97.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 77.5 | Overwatch | 82.7 | 83.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 71.3 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 51.6 | Warzone | 79.7 | 80.5 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 86.7 | Valheim | 84.8 | 85.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 3 3250U | 180% |
Core i3-1110G4 | 431% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1110G4 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 3 3250U since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 10W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 138 | 152 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 344 | 596 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 309 | 402 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 751 | 1474 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 556 | 793 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2278 | 3078 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | Single-Core | 1889 | 2654 | Multi-Core | 4204 | 6158 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | Single-Core | 810 | 1294 | Multi-Core | 1837 | 2820 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | Announcement date | January 06, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1449 | Core name | Dali | Tiger Lake | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | 2 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 3800 millions | 3200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 10 W | Memory type | DDR4 | LPDDR4x-4267 | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | 1MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM3250C4T2OFG | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 3250U is 3% better than Core i3-1110G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1110G4 is better: 29 All the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and Intel Core i3-1110G4 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
Intel Core i3-1110G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Core i3-8350K
| |
|