|
Intel Core i3-1110G4 vs Intel Core i7-4790 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-1110G4 vs Intel Core i7-4790 and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Furmark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, SuperPi, WPrime, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Gears 5, RealBench, Blender, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-4790 or Intel Core i3-1110G4.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1110G4 | 51% |
Core i7-4790 | 52% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-4790 is 1% better than Core i3-1110G4. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1110G4 | 51% |
Core i7-4790 | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.9 | 92.1 | Valorant | 103.3 | 104.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.8 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 97.1 | 98.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.5 | 78.5 | Overwatch | 83.6 | 84.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.3 | 72.2 | DOOM Eternal | 51.6 | 52.3 | Warzone | 80.5 | 81.6 | Assassin's Creed | 86.7 | 87.9 | Valheim | 85.7 | 86.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1110G4 | 431% |
Core i7-4790 | 31% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1110G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-4790 as it consumes less power: 10W vs. 84W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i7-4790 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 145 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 596 | 728 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 402 | 384 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1474 | 1819 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 793 | 974 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3078 | 4564 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i7-4790 | Single-Core | 2654 | 2247 | Multi-Core | 6158 | 7177 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i7-4790 | Single-Core | 1294 | 785 | Multi-Core | 2820 | 4018 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i7-4790 | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | April 01, 2014 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1449 | FCLGA1150 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Haswell | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | 2 GT/s | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 3200 millions | 1480 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 84 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-4790 is 30% better than Core i3-1110G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-4790 has 2 more core than Core i3-1110G4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1110G4 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-4790 is better: 25 Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-1110G4 and Intel Core i7-4790 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-1110G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i7-4790 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|