 |
Intel Core i7-7820EQ vs Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-7820EQ vs Intel Core i3-1110G4 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Handbrake, WPrime, MATLAB, SuperPi, Blender, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Furmark, 3DMark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, Prime95, RealBench, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator.
And how good the processors are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1110G4 or Intel Core i7-7820EQ.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-7820EQ | 52% |
Core i3-1110G4 | 51% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-7820EQ is 1% better than Core i3-1110G4. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-7820EQ | 52% |
Core i3-1110G4 | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.1 | 90.9 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 103.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 57.8 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 97.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 77.5 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 83.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 71.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.3 | 51.6 | | Warzone | 81.6 | 80.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.9 | 86.7 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 85.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-7820EQ | 71% |
Core i3-1110G4 | 431% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1110G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-7820EQ as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 10W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 140 | 152 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 704 | 596 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 359 | 402 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1758 | 1474 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 955 | 793 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4563 | 3078 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | | Single-Core | 2242 | 2654 | | Multi-Core | 7037 | 6158 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | | Single-Core | 961 | 1294 | | Multi-Core | 4012 | 2820 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
Intel Core i3-1110G4 | | Announcement date | March 07, 2017 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Embedded | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1449 | | Core name | Kaby Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 7 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 8 | 4 | | Bus rate | | 2 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 3200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 10 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-7820EQ is 16% better than Core i3-1110G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-7820EQ has 2 more core than Core i3-1110G4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-7820EQ is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1110G4 is better: 11
Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-7820EQ and Intel Core i3-1110G4 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-7820EQ Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8350K
Intel Core i3-1110G4 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
|
|
|
