Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6589 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6589 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6589 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, compare of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Adreno 308.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6589 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Snapdragon 215 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Octane V2, Neocore, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MT6589 or Snapdragon 215 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

 
MediaTek MT6589
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT65891% Snapdragon 2151%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT658920% Snapdragon 21534%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT65891% Snapdragon 2151%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6589 Snapdragon 215
Total score1428024681
CPU39916910
GPU54269383
MEM22823943
UX25674442

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6589 Snapdragon 215
Single-Core3738
Multi-Core174134

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6589 Snapdragon 215
Frequency1200 MHz1300 MHz
Cores44
Bit3264
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR 3
Max. Memory1 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency266533
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 215 is 7% better than MT6589 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR SGX544Adreno 308
GPU Frequency286 MHz500 MHz
GFloPS9.227
# of Cores1
# of Shader Units24
Display1280 x 720 pixels1560 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile4.74.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)11.917.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra7.39.3
Call of Duty: Mobile6.29.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)8.213.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition14.822.2
Real Racing 314.614
Sniper 3D13.917.7
Need for Speed No Limits10.211.2
Mortal Kombat X9.510.7
CSR Racing 28.813
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)2x Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6589 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 is better: 29
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6589 and Snapdragon 215, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6589 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Snapdragon 215 SoC - all data

• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MT6589 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


Snapdragon 215 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands