 |
Intel Core i5-6600 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-6600 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, Blender, 7zip, RealBench, SuperPi, Gears 5, Furmark, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, MATLAB, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 3200G or Intel Core i5-6600.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-6600 | 51% |
Ryzen 3 3200G | 52% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 3 3200G is 1% better than Core i5-6600. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-6600 | 52% |
Ryzen 3 3200G | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Control, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.7 | 91.6 | | Valorant | 104.3 | 104.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.4 | 58.3 | | Apex Legends | 98.0 | 97.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.2 | 78.1 | | Overwatch | 84.4 | 84.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.9 | 71.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.1 | 52.0 | | Warzone | 81.3 | 81.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.6 | 87.4 | | Valheim | 86.5 | 86.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-6600 | 54% |
Ryzen 3 3200G | 54% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6600 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 166 | 154 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 597 | 605 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 381 | 390 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1411 | 1481 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1041 | 960 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3741 | 3934 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6600 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | | Single-Core | 2294 | 2252 | | Multi-Core | 6107 | 7259 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6600 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | | Single-Core | 1068 | 1067 | | Multi-Core | 3667 | 3525 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-6600 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | | Announcement date | September 27, 2015 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | AM4 | | Core name | Skylake | Picasso | | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | | Generation | 6 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 3800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | 384KB | | L2 cache | | 2MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 4MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD3200C5M4MFH
YD3200C5FHBOX
YD3200C5FHMPK
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 3200G is 8% better than Core i5-6600 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6600 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is better: 14
Although it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-6600 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200G before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-6600 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i7-9700K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1500X
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
|
|
|
