|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, PassMark, 7zip, WPrime, Handbrake, Prime95, 3DMark, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, RealBench, PCMark 10. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 3200G or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 | 55% |
Ryzen 3 3200G | 52% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 is 5% better than Ryzen 3 3200G. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 | 54% |
Ryzen 3 3200G | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.4 | 91.6 | Valorant | 108.4 | 104.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 58.3 | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 97.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 78.1 | Overwatch | 87.8 | 84.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 71.8 | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 52.0 | Warzone | 84.6 | 81.2 | Assassin's Creed | 91.1 | 87.4 | Valheim | 90.0 | 86.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 | 91% |
Ryzen 3 3200G | 54% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 3 3200G as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 237 | 154 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1768 | 605 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 557 | 390 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3929 | 1481 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1424 | 960 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10787 | 3934 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | Single-Core | 3054 | 2252 | Multi-Core | 19015 | 7259 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | Single-Core | 1775 | 1067 | Multi-Core | 7253 | 3525 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | Announcement date | September 20, 2022 | July 07, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | AM4 | Core name | Vermeer | Picasso | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen+ | Generation | 5 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 6 | 4 | Threads | 12 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 3800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2933 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 384KB | 384KB | L2 cache | 3MB | 2MB | L3 cache | 16MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000833
| YD3200C5M4MFH YD3200C5FHBOX YD3200C5FHMPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 is 2% better than Ryzen 3 3200G in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 has 2 more core than Ryzen 3 3200G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is better: 2 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200G before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
| |
|