|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810, compare of GPUs Mali-G52 MP6 and Adreno 630. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 845 SDM845 is octa-core (Kryo 385) and Kirin 810 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Octane V2, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 845 SDM845 or Kirin 810 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 845 SDM845 | 20% |
Kirin 810 | 17% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 845 SDM845 | 63% |
Kirin 810 | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 845 SDM845 | 19% |
Kirin 810 | 15% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 845 SDM845 |
Kirin 810 | Total score | 280088 | 244271 | CPU | 78415 | 68392 | GPU | 106425 | 92828 | MEM | 44812 | 39092 | UX | 50418 | 43972 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 845 SDM845 |
Kirin 810 | Single-Core | 616 | 503 | Multi-Core | 2218 | 2015 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 845 SDM845 |
Kirin 810 | Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2270 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 | 2x2.27 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 29.8 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 845 SDM845 is 18% better than Kirin 810 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 630 | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 712 | 426 | # of Cores | | 6 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.3 | 28.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 54.9 | 32.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 61.6 | 58.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 53.7 | 39.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 47.1 | 24.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 69.9 | 37.6 | Real Racing 3 | 123.2 | 73 | Sniper 3D | 135.5 | 93.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 86.2 | 81.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 98.6 | 93.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 86.2 | 70.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 280 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X20 LTE modem | 21 | Download speed | 1200 MBit/s. | 1400 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 810 is better: 9 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Snapdragon 845 SDM845 and Kirin 810, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 845 SDM845 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Kirin 810 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
| |
|