Qualcomm QCS4290 is a mid-end chip designed for mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets and IoT devices, date of announcement 2021. The SoC created by a 11 nm process. The chip has a eight cores divided into two blocks. The first Kryo 260 is the most powerful with four cores running at 2.0 GHz. The second cluster Kryo 260 has four cores running at 1.8 GHz. The SoC can work with 64-bit data. Adreno 610 GPU is responsible for operating with graphical data. Devices that have the Qualcomm QCS4290 installed can work in LTE networks. Modem Qualcomm QCM4290 LTE modem allows you to download and upload data at a speed 410 MBit/s and 170 MBit/s. You can understand Qualcomm QCS4290 SoC is good or bad by looking at testing data and comparisons with other processors.Qualcomm QCS4290 specifications General Info Brand Qualcomm Name QCS4290 Model Kryo 260 Release date 2021 CPU configuration 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260, 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Instruction set architecture ARMv8-A Frequency 2000 MHz Cores 8 Word Size 64 bit Process 11 nm Transistor count ? Technologies Hexagon 683 DSP, Quick Charge 3.0, Signal Boost,Qualcomm apt, Envelope tracking technology, Hexagon Vector eXtensions (HVX), All-Ways Aware technology, Aqstic, High-power transmit (HPUE) Security WPA3-Enterprise, Qualcomm Processor Security, Qualcomm Device Lock Authentication, Qualcomm Fingerprint Sensors, Malware Protection, WPA3-Personal, WPA3 Easy Connect, Qualcomm Mobile Security, Qualcomm Content Protection Power consumption (TDP) 9 W
Graphics GPU Adreno 610 Frequency 750 MHz Process 11 nm
Memory Type LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) Frequency 1866/933 Max volume 8 Gb Internal type eMMC 5.1 Memory bandwidth 13.91 GB/s Memory bus 2x 16 Bit
Connectivity Modem Qualcomm QCM4290 LTE modem Download speed 410 MBit/s Upload speed 170 MBit/s LTE Cat Cat-13 DL/Cat-12 UL Wi-Fi ranges 802.11ac Wave 2, 802.11ax-ready, a/b/g/n/ac Location SBAS, Beidou, GPS, Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, GNSS, QZSS Wi-Fi ver. 6 Bluetooth ver. 5
Cameras Main camera max resolution 48 MPix Second camera max resolution 16 and 16 MPix Codecs 3840 x 2160, max FPS 120. Codec: H.264/AVC,H.265/HEVC Technologies Hybrid Autofocus, Zero Shutter, Dual Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), 2xImage Signal Processor (ISP) 14-bit, Qualcomm Clear Sight, High quality video capture with Motion Compensated Temporal Filterin
Display and Audio Maximum Display resolution 1600 x 900 pix Video encoding Resolution 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD, max FPS 60. Codec: H.264/AVC,H.265/HEVC Audio codecs CAF WAV MP3 MP4 AIFF
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu v10 • 3DMark • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile Qualcomm QCS4290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Apple A9 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 Qualcomm QCS4290 review VIDEO