Qualcomm QCS4290 vs Unisoc Tiger T7510

Comparisons 18-02-2023

Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm QCS4290 vs Unisoc Tiger T7510, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy QCS4290 or Tiger T7510.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

QCS4290

12%

Tiger T7510

17%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

QCS4290

70%

Tiger T7510

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

QCS4290

11%

Tiger T7510

16%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	QCS4290	Tiger T7510
Total score	175559	243859
CPU	49149	68287
GPU	66709	92666
MEM	28099	39007
UX	31609	43889

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	QCS4290	Tiger T7510
Single-Core	359	503
Multi-Core	1511	2012

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	QCS4290	Tiger T7510
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	11 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866/933	1066
Memory bandwidth	13.91	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		256 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 610	PowerVR GM 9446
GPU Frequency	750 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	312	204
# of Cores		3
# of Shader Units	192
Display	1600 x 900 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	23.3	27.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	27.4	31.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.6	57.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	30.4	38.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	24.8	23.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	33.8	36.4
Real Racing 3	73.3	85.8
Sniper 3D	93.4	74.4
Need for Speed No Limits	82.9	103
Mortal Kombat X	93.1	82.9
CSR Racing 2	82.4	68.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Triple ISP	Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS	60	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm QCM4290 LTE modem	Ivy V510 5G
Download speed	410 MBit/s.	7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	170 MBit/s.	3000 MBit/s.
Navigation	SBAS, Beidou, GPS, Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, GNSS, QZSS	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS4290 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T7510 is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

QCS4290 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCS4290 specs and review.

Tiger T7510 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T7510 specs and review.