Comparisons 05-11-2023
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm QCM5430 vs Qualcomm QCM4290, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, and how good the CPUs are in games Minecraft, Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy QCM5430 or QCM4290.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCM5430 |
QCM4290 | | Total score | 585984 | 177332 | | CPU | 164069 | 49659 | | GPU | 222675 | 67391 | | MEM | 93766 | 28382 | | UX | 105471 | 31915 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCM5430 |
QCM4290 | | Single-Core | 910 | 363 | | Multi-Core | 3310 | 1526 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCM5430 |
QCM4290 | | Frequency | 2700 MHz | 2000 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 11 nm | | Transistors count | 5200 millions | | | Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus
2x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold
3x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 1866/933 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 13.91 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM5430 is 25% better than QCM4290 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCM5430 has 2 more core than QCM4290. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 610 | | GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 750 MHz | | GFloPS | 906.58 | 312 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 512 | 192 | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 900 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 26.8 | 24.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 66.7 | 28.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 91.9 | 59.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 50.8 | 31.3 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 57.5 | 24.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 84.7 | 34.7 | | Real Racing 3 | 114.3 | 89.5 | | Sniper 3D | 146.8 | 95.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 128.5 | 83.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | 119.7 | 77.9 | | CSR Racing 2 | 119.7 | 83.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 48 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 16 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | Triple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Modem QCM6490 5G | Qualcomm QCM4290 LTE modem | | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 410 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 170 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, GPS, GBeidou, QZSS | GLONASS, Galileo, SBAS, Beidou, GNSS, GPS, QZSS, NavIC | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM5430 is better: 40
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM4290 is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCM5430 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
QCM4290 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
|
