|
Rockchip RK3126C vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Rockchip RK3126C vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-T628 MP6. This performance comparison involves two processors: Rockchip RK3126C is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A15). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, Geekbench, AnTuTu, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Sniper 3D, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Rockchip RK3126C or Exynos 5 Octa 5420 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3126C | 1% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3126C | 32% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 | 21% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3126C | 1% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3126C |
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 | Total score | 19847 | 33608 | CPU | 5558 | 9416 | GPU | 7536 | 12777 | MEM | 3169 | 5370 | UX | 3579 | 6058 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3126C |
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 | Single-Core | 52 | 89 | Multi-Core | 242 | 410 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3126C |
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1900 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A15 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 7 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is 31% better than Rockchip RK3126C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3126C has 4 more core than Exynos 5 Octa 5420. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-400 MP2 | Mali-T628 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 680 MHz | GFloPS | 9 | 176 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.1 | 9.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.5 | 26.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 8.6 | 17.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 6.6 | 15.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 10.1 | 21.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 18.2 | 33.3 | Real Racing 3 | 10.8 | 30.8 | Sniper 3D | 11.2 | 38.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 12 | 21.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 9.9 | 22.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 12 | 22.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | | 11 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3126C is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is better: 36 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Rockchip RK3126C and Exynos 5 Octa 5420, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Rockchip RK3126C SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|