Comparisons 17-05-2022
Full comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 1080, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8000 or Exynos 1080.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 96% |
Exynos 1080 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 88% |
Exynos 1080 | 91% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 91% |
Exynos 1080 | 97% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
Exynos 1080 | | Total score | 777515 | 676347 | | CPU | 163368 | 196254 | | GPU | 139627 | 275018 | | MEM | 106600 | 106639 | | UX | 93142 | 98702 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
Exynos 1080 | | Single-Core | 1145 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 4015 | 3731 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
Exynos 1080 | | Frequency | 2750 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x2.75 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 64 KB | | | L2 cache | 640 KB | | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 1080 is 8% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 912 | 1076 | | # of Cores | 6 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 79.5 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 43.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 67.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 99.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 59.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 76.3 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 57.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 69.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 66.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC | Galileo, QZSS, GPS, Glonass, Beidou, SBAS | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 1080 is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 1080
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
|
