MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus, compare of GPUs Mali-G77 MC9 and Mali-G77 MC9.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 1100 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A78) and Dimensity 1000 Plus is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, Geekbench, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chipsets in PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Dimensity 1100 or Dimensity 1000 Plus and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 1100

42%

Dimensity 1000 Plus

36%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 1100

79%

Dimensity 1000 Plus

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 1100

39%

Dimensity 1000 Plus

35%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 1100	Dimensity 1000 Plus
Total score	592862	502425
CPU	165998	140682
GPU	225277	190923
MEM	94858	80391
UX	106709	90427

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 1100	Dimensity 1000 Plus
Single-Core	1261	908
Multi-Core	3913	3316

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 1100	Dimensity 1000 Plus
Frequency	2600 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	5600 millions
Core configuration	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	2133
Memory bandwidth	29	29.87
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	320 KB
L3 cache	8 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	504	504
# of Cores	9	9
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.7	30.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	67.2	44.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	92.9	57.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	51.5	54.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	57.1	36.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	84.7	57.3
Real Racing 3	116.1	115.4
Sniper 3D	148.6	109.6
Need for Speed No Limits	130.1	80.8
Mortal Kombat X	120.8	92.3
CSR Racing 2	120.8	69.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	80 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1100 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Dimensity 1100 and Dimensity 1000 Plus, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 1100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 1100 specs and review.

Dimensity 1000 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• Dimensity 1000 Plus specs and review.