MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G57 MC3 and Mali-G77 MC9.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Dimensity 1100 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A78) and Dimensity 800U is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Octane V2, PCMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1100 or Dimensity 800U and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 1100

42%

Dimensity 800U

23%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 1100

79%

Dimensity 800U

76%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 1100

39%

Dimensity 800U

22%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 1100	Dimensity 800U
Total score	592862	329621
CPU	165998	92292
GPU	225277	125254
MEM	94858	52742
UX	106709	59341

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 1100	Dimensity 800U
Single-Core	1261	738
Multi-Core	3913	2510

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 1100	Dimensity 800U
Frequency	2600 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	5600 millions
Core configuration	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	2133
Memory bandwidth	29	17.07
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	320 KB
L3 cache	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1100 is 7% better than Dimensity 800U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Mali-G57 MC3
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	504	512
# of Cores	9	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.7	30.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	67.2	42.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	92.9	53.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	51.5	48.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	57.1	35.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	84.7	59.7
Real Racing 3	116.1	66.6
Sniper 3D	148.6	101.3
Need for Speed No Limits	130.1	95.9
Mortal Kombat X	120.8	61.3
CSR Racing 2	120.8	58.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	1200 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5	BeiDou B1I, QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1100 is better: 32
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 800U is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 1100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 1100 specs and review.

Dimensity 800U SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 800U specs and review.