|
Intel Core i7-5850EQ vs Intel Core i5-8400T |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i7-5850EQ vs Intel Core i5-8400T and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, RealBench, SuperPi, Prime95, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Furmark, WPrime, PassMark, 3DMark, AIDA64, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Blender, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-8400T or Intel Core i7-5850EQ.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-5850EQ | 52% |
Core i5-8400T | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-5850EQ | 52% |
Core i5-8400T | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.2 | 92.6 | Valorant | 105.9 | 105.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 58.9 | Apex Legends | 99.6 | 98.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 78.9 | Overwatch | 85.8 | 85.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.1 | 72.6 | DOOM Eternal | 53.0 | 52.6 | Warzone | 82.6 | 82.1 | Assassin's Creed | 89.0 | 88.4 | Valheim | 87.9 | 87.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-5850EQ | 94% |
Core i5-8400T | 91% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-5850EQ is more energy efficient than the Core i5-8400T as it consumes less power: 47W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-5850EQ |
Intel Core i5-8400T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 140 | 139 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 666 | 696 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 360 | 387 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1763 | 1647 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 993 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4576 | 3896 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5850EQ |
Intel Core i5-8400T | Single-Core | 2140 | 1949 | Multi-Core | 7057 | 7393 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5850EQ |
Intel Core i5-8400T | Single-Core | 1334 | 958 | Multi-Core | 5101 | 4499 |
Comparison of specifications
| Intel Core i7-5850EQ |
Intel Core i5-8400T | Announcement date | July 07, 2015 | July 07, 2018 | Type | Embedded | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1364 | FCLGA1151 | Core name | Broadwell | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 5 | 8 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 1.7 MHz | Cores | 4 | 6 | Threads | 8 | 6 | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2100 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 47 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR3L 1600 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 9 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-5850EQ is 37% better than Core i5-8400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-8400T has 2 more core than Core i7-5850EQ. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-5850EQ is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8400T is better: 13 Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-5850EQ and Intel Core i5-8400T before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-5850EQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-8350K
Intel Core i5-8400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
| |
|