 |
Intel Core i5-8265UC vs Intel Core i3-8100B |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-8265UC vs Intel Core i3-8100B and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Furmark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Blender, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Blender, Gears 5, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, RealBench, WPrime, 7zip, MATLAB, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-8100B or Intel Core i5-8265UC.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-8265UC | 51% |
Core i3-8100B | 52% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-8100B is 1% better than Core i5-8265UC. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-8265UC | 51% |
Core i3-8100B | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.8 | 91.7 | | Valorant | 103.2 | 104.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.8 | 58.3 | | Apex Legends | 97.0 | 97.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.4 | 78.1 | | Overwatch | 83.6 | 84.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.2 | 71.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.6 | 52.1 | | Warzone | 80.5 | 81.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.7 | 87.5 | | Valheim | 85.6 | 86.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-8265UC | 224% |
Core i3-8100B | 48% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-8265UC is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8100B as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-8100B | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 157 | 169 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 548 | 663 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 348 | 447 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1507 | 1639 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 896 | 881 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3115 | 3423 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-8100B | | Single-Core | 2222 | 2236 | | Multi-Core | 6005 | 6849 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-8100B | | Single-Core | 1011 | 939 | | Multi-Core | 2749 | 3598 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-8100B | | Announcement date | November 07, 2018 | November 07, 2018 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Whiskey Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | | | Frequency | 1.6 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 4 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 2000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8100B is 55% better than Core i5-8265UC in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8265UC is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8100B is better: 22
Although it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-8265UC and Intel Core i3-8100B before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-8265UC Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i3-8100B Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i3-8350K
|
|
|
