|
Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-11400F |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-11400F tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Blender, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, PassMark, SuperPi, RealBench, WPrime, VeraCrypt, 7zip. And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Valorant
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11400F or Intel Core i3-8100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-8100 | 52% |
Core i5-11400F | 55% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-11400F is 5% better than Core i3-8100. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-8100 | 52% |
Core i5-11400F | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.7 | 98.4 | Valorant | 104.2 | 111.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.4 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 98.0 | 105.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.2 | 83.9 | Overwatch | 84.4 | 90.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.9 | 77.1 | DOOM Eternal | 52.1 | 55.9 | Warzone | 81.3 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 87.5 | 93.9 | Valheim | 86.5 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-8100 | 53% |
Core i5-11400F | 118% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-11400F is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8100 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-8100 |
Intel Core i5-11400F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 154 | 180 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 616 | 1726 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 364 | 421 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1444 | 3865 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 792 | 1099 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3076 | 10233 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8100 |
Intel Core i5-11400F | Single-Core | 2223 | 2451 | Multi-Core | 6698 | 18669 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8100 |
Intel Core i5-11400F | Single-Core | 1052 | 2309 | Multi-Core | 3633 | 10184 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
Intel Core i5-11400F | Announcement date | December 24, 2017 | January 20, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Rocket Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 6 | Threads | 4 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 5400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 50 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 3 MB | L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8100 is 27% better than Core i5-11400F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-11400F has 2 more core than Core i3-8100. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8100 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11400F is better: 31 Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Core i5-11400F before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-8100 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
Intel Core i5-11400F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
| |
|