 |
Intel Core i5-1334U vs Intel Core i9-12950HX |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-1334U vs Intel Core i9-12950HX tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, 3DMark, Gears 5, WPrime, AIDA64, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12950HX or Intel Core i5-1334U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-1334U | 55% |
Core i9-12950HX | 69% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12950HX is 20% better than Core i5-1334U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-1334U | 54% |
Core i9-12950HX | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.4 | 105.0 | | Valorant | 109.6 | 119.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.4 | 66.8 | | Apex Legends | 103.0 | 112.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.2 | 89.5 | | Overwatch | 88.8 | 96.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.6 | 82.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.8 | 59.6 | | Warzone | 85.5 | 93.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 100.2 | | Valheim | 90.9 | 99.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-1334U | 318% |
Core i9-12950HX | 120% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1334U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12950HX as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 55W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1334U |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 240 | 571 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1817 | 5968 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 589 | 950 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4138 | 13264 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1390 | 3358 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13666 | 38163 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1334U |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Single-Core | 3270 | 3598 | | Multi-Core | 19135 | 65436 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1334U |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Single-Core | 1431 | 1991 | | Multi-Core | 8260 | 16637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-1334U |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | June 19, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1964 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 16 | | Threads | 12 | 24 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 12400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 55 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 2 MB | | L2 cache | | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 30 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12950HX is 5% better than Core i5-1334U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12950HX has 6 more core than Core i5-1334U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1334U is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12950HX is better: 33
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-1334U and Intel Core i9-12950HX before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1334U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
Intel Core i9-12950HX Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
|
|
|
