|
Intel Core i3-8100T vs Intel Core i7-3630QM |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-8100T vs Intel Core i7-3630QM and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Prime95, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Handbrake, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, WPrime, Gears 5. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-3630QM or Intel Core i3-8100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-8100T | 51% |
Core i7-3630QM | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-8100T | 51% |
Core i7-3630QM | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Control, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.3 | 91.1 | Valorant | 103.8 | 103.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 58.0 | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 97.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 77.6 | Overwatch | 84.1 | 83.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 71.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 51.8 | Warzone | 80.9 | 80.8 | Assassin's Creed | 87.2 | 87.0 | Valheim | 86.1 | 85.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-8100T | 83% |
Core i7-3630QM | 57% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-8100T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-3630QM as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-3630QM | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 132 | 120 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 530 | 590 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 347 | 245 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1274 | 1230 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 685 | 722 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2660 | 3469 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-3630QM | Single-Core | 1951 | 1699 | Multi-Core | 5323 | 5080 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-3630QM | Single-Core | 876 | 780 | Multi-Core | 3255 | 3044 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-3630QM | Announcement date | July 07, 2018 | January 01, 2012 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | rPGA988B | Core name | Coffee Lake | Ivy Bridge | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8100T is 22% better than Core i7-3630QM in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8100T is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3630QM is better: 6 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-8100T and Intel Core i7-3630QM before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-8100T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
| |
|