|
Intel Core i3-7020U vs Intel Pentium 6405U |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-7020U vs Intel Pentium 6405U tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, 7zip, PassMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Prime95, SuperPi, RealBench, Blender, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Pentium 6405U or Intel Core i3-7020U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-7020U | 50% |
Pentium 6405U | 50% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-7020U | 50% |
Pentium 6405U | 50% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.5 | 89.4 | Valorant | 101.7 | 101.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.9 | 56.9 | Apex Legends | 95.6 | 95.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.2 | 76.2 | Overwatch | 82.3 | 82.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.1 | 70.1 | DOOM Eternal | 50.8 | 50.8 | Warzone | 79.3 | 79.3 | Assassin's Creed | 85.4 | 85.4 | Valheim | 84.4 | 84.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-7020U | 144% |
Pentium 6405U | 122% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-7020U is more energy efficient than the Pentium 6405U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-7020U |
Intel Pentium 6405U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 94 | 104 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 227 | 249 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 258 | 225 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 609 | 519 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 434 | 560 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1682 | 1336 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7020U |
Intel Pentium 6405U | Single-Core | 1328 | 1408 | Multi-Core | 2586 | 2363 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7020U |
Intel Pentium 6405U | Single-Core | 648 | 552 | Multi-Core | 1432 | 1407 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-7020U |
Intel Pentium 6405U | Announcement date | July 07, 2018 | November 07, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-BGA1356, FCBGA1356 | FCBGA1528 | Core name | Kaby Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 7 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 1900 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Pentium 6405U is 4% better than Core i3-7020U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7020U is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium 6405U is better: 10 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-7020U and Intel Pentium 6405U before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-7020U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs 3020e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Intel Pentium 6405U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs 3020e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|