AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Processor comparisons   12-02-2023
   Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, 3DMark, RealBench, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Furmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, MATLAB, 7zip, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:

Valheim
Borderlands 3
Fallout 76
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Fortnite
DOOM: Eternal
Death Stranding
Watch Dogs Legion
Red Dead Redemption 2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Overwatch
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Cyberpunk 2077
Rainbow Six Siege
Last Man Standing
Apex Legends
Grand Theft Auto V
Valorant
Halo Infinite

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 2400G or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G

53%

Ryzen 5 2400G

52%

This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is 1% better than Ryzen 5 2400G. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G

53%

Ryzen 5 2400G

51%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	93.7	91.5
Valorant	106.5	103.9
Cyberpunk 2077	59.6	58.2
Apex Legends	100.1	97.7
Call of Duty Warzone	79.9	77.9
Overwatch	86.3	84.2
Red Dead Redemption 2	73.5	71.7
DOOM Eternal	53.2	52.0
Warzone	83.1	81.1
Assassin's Creed	89.5	87.3
Valheim	88.4	86.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G

65%

Ryzen 5 2400G

44%

To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 2400G as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G	AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Cinbench 15 Single-core	212	155
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	1098	811
Cinbench 20 Single-core	513	391
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	2577	1922
Cinbench 23 Single-core	1257	1021
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	6434	4800

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G	AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Single-Core	2728	2182
Multi-Core	11825	8739

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G	AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Single-Core	1275	866
Multi-Core	5598	3390

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

	AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G	AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Announcement date	October 23, 2022	February 12, 2018
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	AM4	AM4
Core name	Renoir	Raven Ridge
Architecture	Zen 2	Zen
Generation	2	2
Turbo Frequency	4 MHz	3.9 MHz
Frequency	3.8 MHz	3.6 MHz
Cores	4	4
Threads	8	8
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	4000 millions	3600 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	65 W	65 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency	3200	2933
Memory bandwidth
L1 cache	256KB	384KB
L2 cache	2MB	2MB
L3 cache	4MB	4MB
Overclocking	No	Yes
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	100-000001079 100-000001079MPK	YD2400C5M4MFB YD2400C5FBBOX YD2400C5FBMPK

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is 5% better than Ryzen 5 2400G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is better: 2
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G specs and review.

• AMD Ryzen 5 2400G specs and review.

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE