 |
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs Intel Core i7-3770 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like AIDA64, MATLAB, Furmark, 7zip, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, PCMark 10, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, PassMark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-3770 or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 53% |
Core i7-3770 | 51% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is 3% better than Core i7-3770. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 53% |
Core i7-3770 | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.7 | 91.4 | | Valorant | 106.5 | 103.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.6 | 58.2 | | Apex Legends | 100.1 | 97.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.9 | 77.9 | | Overwatch | 86.3 | 84.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.5 | 71.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.2 | 51.9 | | Warzone | 83.1 | 81.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 89.5 | 87.2 | | Valheim | 88.4 | 86.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 65% |
Core i7-3770 | 35% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is more energy efficient than the Core i7-3770 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 77W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 212 | 134 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1098 | 669 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 513 | 298 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2577 | 1419 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1257 | 820 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6434 | 3650 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Single-Core | 2728 | 2091 | | Multi-Core | 11825 | 6346 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Single-Core | 1275 | 823 | | Multi-Core | 5598 | 3319 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Announcement date | October 23, 2022 | January 01, 2012 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | AM4 | LGA1155 | | Core name | Renoir | Ivy Bridge | | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | | Generation | 2 | | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm | | Transistors count | 4000 millions | 1440 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 77 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3 1333/1600 | | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 25.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 256KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 4MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000001079
100-000001079MPK | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is 10% better than Core i7-3770 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3770 is better: 5
However, it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G and Intel Core i7-3770 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
Intel Core i7-3770 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
