 |
Intel Core i3-6100 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-6100 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark 10, SuperPi, PassMark, Gears 5, Prime95, MATLAB, 7zip, 3DMark, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, UserBenchmark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Fortnite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 2400G or Intel Core i3-6100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-6100 | 51% |
Ryzen 5 2400G | 52% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 2400G is 1% better than Core i3-6100. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-6100 | 51% |
Ryzen 5 2400G | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.3 | 91.5 | | Valorant | 102.6 | 103.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 58.2 | | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 97.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 77.9 | | Overwatch | 83.1 | 84.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 71.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 52.0 | | Warzone | 80.1 | 81.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 87.3 | | Valheim | 85.2 | 86.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-6100 | 68% |
Ryzen 5 2400G | 44% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-6100 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 2400G since it has less power consumption: 51W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-6100 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 155 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 392 | 811 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 368 | 391 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 916 | 1922 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 538 | 1021 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2090 | 4800 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6100 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | | Single-Core | 2256 | 2182 | | Multi-Core | 4180 | 8739 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6100 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | | Single-Core | 1050 | 866 | | Multi-Core | 2271 | 3390 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | | Announcement date | September 17, 2015 | February 12, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | AM4 | | Core name | Skylake | Raven Ridge | | Architecture | x86 | Zen | | Generation | 6 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 3600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 51 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | 384KB | | L2 cache | | 2MB | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 4MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD2400C5M4MFB
YD2400C5FBBOX
YD2400C5FBMPK
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-6100 is 2% better than Ryzen 5 2400G in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 5 2400G has 2 more core than Core i3-6100. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-6100 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is better: 29
Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-6100 and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-6100 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
|
|
|
