|
Intel Core i3-8350K vs Intel Core i7-1060NG7 |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-8350K vs Intel Core i7-1060NG7 and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Gears 5, 3DMark, AIDA64, RealBench, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, PCMark 10, Furmark, Blender, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, PassMark, UserBenchmark, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1060NG7 or Intel Core i3-8350K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-8350K | 52% |
Core i7-1060NG7 | 51% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-8350K is 1% better than Core i7-1060NG7. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-8350K | 52% |
Core i7-1060NG7 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.6 | 92.1 | Valorant | 105.2 | 104.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.9 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 98.9 | 98.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.9 | 78.5 | Overwatch | 85.2 | 84.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.6 | 72.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.6 | 52.3 | Warzone | 82.1 | 81.6 | Assassin's Creed | 88.4 | 87.9 | Valheim | 87.3 | 86.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-8350K | 48% |
Core i7-1060NG7 | 410% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1060NG7 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8350K as it consumes less power: 91W vs. 10W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-8350K |
Intel Core i7-1060NG7 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 177 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 684 | 675 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 447 | 441 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1711 | 1587 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 887 | 1119 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3447 | 4329 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8350K |
Intel Core i7-1060NG7 | Single-Core | 2527 | 1928 | Multi-Core | 6896 | 6215 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8350K |
Intel Core i7-1060NG7 | Single-Core | 1318 | 1230 | Multi-Core | 4485 | 3976 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-8350K |
Intel Core i7-1060NG7 | Announcement date | December 10, 2017 | July 07, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCBGA1526 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Ice Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 4 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 6800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 91 W | 10 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | LPDDR4-3733 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 58.3 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8350K is 70% better than Core i7-1060NG7 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8350K is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1060NG7 is better: 11 Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-8350K and Intel Core i7-1060NG7 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-8350K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Core i3-8100
Intel Core i7-1060NG7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|