MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula

Comparisons   09-12-2022
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of chips in GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Dimensity 8200 or T760 Tanggula.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8200

71%

T760 Tanggula

19%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8200

84%

T760 Tanggula

80%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8200

70%

T760 Tanggula

18%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8200	T760 Tanggula
Total score	994025	276292
CPU	278320	77358
GPU	377731	104988
MEM	159047	44197
UX	178931	49730

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8200	T760 Tanggula
Single-Core	1216	570
Multi-Core	4132	2279

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8200	T760 Tanggula
Frequency	3100 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	256 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8200 is 29% better than T760 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G57 MP6
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	912	846
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	37.1	31.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	118.8	49.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	69.2	43.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	64.8	38.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	100.3	45.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	145.9	64.5
Real Racing 3	141.1	65.5
Sniper 3D	155.5	56.5
Need for Speed No Limits	98.2	52.2
Mortal Kombat X	101.5	63.3
CSR Racing 2	85.8	52.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP	Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	240	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Ivy V510 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	1500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T760 Tanggula is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 8200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8200 specs and review.

T760 Tanggula SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• T760 Tanggula specs and review.