MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Comparisons   09-12-2022
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Geekbench, Quadrant, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
   After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 8200 or Snapdragon 695.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8200

71%

Snapdragon 695

26%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8200

84%

Snapdragon 695

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8200

70%

Snapdragon 695

24%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8200	Snapdragon 695
Total score	994025	373695
CPU	278320	104639
GPU	377731	142008
MEM	159047	59795
UX	178931	67274

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8200	Snapdragon 695
Single-Core	1216	836
Multi-Core	4132	2846

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8200	Snapdragon 695
Frequency	3100 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	8 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR4x (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	32 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	1866
Memory bandwidth	48	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8200 is 29% better than Snapdragon 695 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Adreno 619
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	912	712
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units		320
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	37.1	26.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	118.8	41.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	69.2	51.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	64.8	34.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	100.3	34.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	145.9	51.7
Real Racing 3	141.1	64.6
Sniper 3D	155.5	66.6
Need for Speed No Limits	98.2	71.7
Mortal Kombat X	101.5	66.2
CSR Racing 2	85.8	61.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP	Qualcomm Spectra 355L
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2800 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	1200 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF	SBAS, Beidou, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, NavIC, GPS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 8200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8200 specs and review.

Snapdragon 695 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 695 specs and review.