MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G

Comparisons   09-12-2022
   Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Dimensity 8200 or Dimensity 600 5G.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8200

71%

Dimensity 600 5G

15%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8200

84%

Dimensity 600 5G

76%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8200

70%

Dimensity 600 5G

13%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8200	Dimensity 600 5G
Total score	994025	215034
CPU	278320	60204
GPU	377731	81704
MEM	159047	34403
UX	178931	38700

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8200	Dimensity 600 5G
Single-Core	1216	443
Multi-Core	4132	1774

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8200	Dimensity 600 5G
Frequency	3100 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	13
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	32 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	320 KB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8200 is 35% better than Dimensity 600 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G57 MC1
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	912
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	37.1	20.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	118.8	40.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	69.2	46.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	64.8	36.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	100.3	35.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	145.9	50.1
Real Racing 3	141.1	69.6
Sniper 3D	155.5	74.2
Need for Speed No Limits	98.2	55.7
Mortal Kombat X	101.5	67.3
CSR Racing 2	85.8	51

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	32 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 8200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8200 specs and review.

Dimensity 600 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 600 5G specs and review.