MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons   09-12-2022
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PassMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Dimensity 8200 or Exynos 2000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8200

71%

Exynos 2000

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8200

84%

Exynos 2000

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8200

70%

Exynos 2000

43%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8200	Exynos 2000
Total score	994025	645405
CPU	278320	180721
GPU	377731	245243
MEM	159047	103264
UX	178931	116171

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8200	Exynos 2000
Single-Core	1216	1268
Multi-Core	4132	4045

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8200	Exynos 2000
Frequency	3100 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	192 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8200 is 6% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	912	854
# of Cores	6	24
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	37.1	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	118.8	72.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	69.2	100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	64.8	56.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	100.3	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	145.9	91.1
Real Racing 3	141.1	175.9
Sniper 3D	155.5	160.8
Need for Speed No Limits	98.2	140.7
Mortal Kombat X	101.5	130.7
CSR Racing 2	85.8	140.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 15
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 8200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8200 specs and review.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.