|
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|
Comparisons 08-10-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chips in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Tensor G3 or Dimensity 8200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTensor G3 | 76% |
Dimensity 8200 | 71% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tensor G3 | 86% |
Dimensity 8200 | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTensor G3 | 73% |
Dimensity 8200 | 70% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tensor G3 |
Dimensity 8200 | Total score | 1071317 | 994025 | CPU | 299978 | 278320 | GPU | 407100 | 377731 | MEM | 171402 | 159047 | UX | 192844 | 178931 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tensor G3 |
Dimensity 8200 | Single-Core | 1403 | 1216 | Multi-Core | 3849 | 4132 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tensor G3 |
Dimensity 8200 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3100 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | 8600 millions | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 4x2.34 GHz Cortex-A715 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8200 is 3% better than Tensor G3 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G715 MP9 | Mali-G610 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 1354.62 | 912 | # of Cores | 9 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 40.3 | 37.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 126.1 | 118.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 76.2 | 69.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 69.9 | 64.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 109.5 | 100.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 156.3 | 145.9 | Real Racing 3 | 152.6 | 141.1 | Sniper 3D | 166.8 | 155.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 106.8 | 98.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 109.7 | 101.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 91.8 | 85.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 360 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | Imagiq 785 ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, AV1 BigWave | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Exynos Modem 5223 | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 10150 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 2750 MBit/s. | Navigation | Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GLONASS, GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS | QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G3 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is better: 8 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tensor G3 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Dimensity 8200 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|