|
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like UserBenchmark, WPrime, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Blender, PassMark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Furmark, PCMark 10. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 or Intel Xeon Gold 5415+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 55% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 5415+ is 1% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.8 | 108.6 | Valorant | 113.4 | 123.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.5 | 69.1 | Apex Legends | 106.6 | 116.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.0 | 92.6 | Overwatch | 91.9 | 100.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.2 | 85.2 | DOOM Eternal | 56.7 | 61.7 | Warzone | 88.5 | 96.3 | Assassin's Creed | 95.3 | 103.7 | Valheim | 94.1 | 102.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 20% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5415+ is more energy efficient than the Xeon E5-2697R v4 as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 145W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 447 | 108 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1426 | 3177 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 983 | 240 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3506 | 7475 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 687 | 641 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19920 | 18061 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Single-Core | 6191 | 1916 | Multi-Core | 20277 | 18383 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Single-Core | 986 | 910 | Multi-Core | 11560 | 20218 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Announcement date | March 15, 2023 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA2011-3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Broadwell | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 8 | 18 | Threads | 16 | 36 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 9.6 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 32000 millions | 4130 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 145 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 15 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 45 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 20% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon E5-2697R v4 has 10 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 is better: 21 Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|